Damages Under Commercial Leases – Part II

<CCLast week we looked at a landlords rights under a commercial lease where the tenant left the property and stopped making rental payments mid way through a lease.

Our firm brought the matter before the Tamworth Local Court before the lease term expired.

In short there were three periods in which the court had to consider the landlord’s right to damages under the lease.  To recap they were as follows:

  1. the time between the tenant ceasing to make rental payments and surrendering the keys;
  2. the time between the tenant surrendering the keys and the date the matter was brought before the court; and
  3. the time between the court date and the end of the lease which was not due to expire for a further six months.
Read More

Damages Under Commercial Leases – Part I

CCAn interesting legal point arose recently in a case that I conducted in the Local Court.  The question centred around the damages that a landlord is entitled to recover from a commercial tenant that breaches a lease.

Six months into the lease the tenant stopped making rental payments. Nine months into the lease, the tenant surrendered the keys to the premises and moved out.

Court proceedings were brought by the landlord and when the matter came before the Tamworth Local Court, about six months of the original lease term remained yet to expire.

The court had to consider whether the landlord was able to recover from the tenant, rental payments for three separate periods:

  1. the time between the tenant ceasing to make rental payments and surrendering the keys;
  2. the time between the tenant surrendering the keys and the date the matter was brought before the court; and
  3. the time between the court date and the end of the lease which was not due to expire for a further six months.
Read More

Is GST Payable on a Residential Purchase if the Proposed Use is Commercial?

TRIn a recent full Federal Court decision, a New South Wales property developer purchased a single story house, intending to develop it into units for use other than for residential accommodation. At the time of settlement the home was occupied by a tenant. The developer adopted the view that the sale was a taxable supply because it was his intention to develop the land into commercial units and consequently claimed a tax credit from the ATO.

The ATO took a different view.

The GST legislation provides that the supply of property is not subject to GST if the premises are to be used predominantly for residential accommodation.… Read More